Comprehensive Ancient Greek Number Converter

Source code at GitHub na4zagin3/elm-grcnum.

Converter

Inspired from Russell Cottrell’s Greek Number Converter.

This document is to provide reliable information and interactive converters of Ancient Greek number systems with proper citations. Currently, it is difficult to find correct information about Ancient Greek number systems in the Internet. For example, Harry Foundalis’ Greek Numbers and Numerals (Ancient and Modern) contains comprehensive description about Modern Greek, but the section about Ancient Greek contains several problems—he insists that Archimedes (287–212 BCE) came up with numerals greater than 1,0000, while Herodotus (484–425 BCE) and others before Archimedes, in fact, casually used δισμύριοι 2,0000 and so on: “ἄνδρες τετρακισχίλιοι καὶ δισμύριοι γίνονται.”—Herodotus Historia 7.185.1. John J O’Connor and Edmund F Robertson’s Greek Number Systems clearly shows they could not read either Ancient or Modern Greek or could not consult people having studied Classics. Russell Cottrell’s The Greek Number Converter is confusing people—an author of article ギリシアの数字 “Greek Numerals” in Wikipedia.ja misunderstood that the method Russell Cottrell invented was actually used by Ancient Greeks.

Notations

In this document, I use myriad (meaning ten-thousand) separators (e.g., 1234,5678,9012) rather than thousand separators (e.g., 123,456,789,012). That is because Ancient Greek numerals are, like Chinese and Japanese, based on ten thousand—therefore 20,0000 or 200,000 is expressed as twenty ten-thousand (εἴκωσι μυριάδες) rather than two hundred thousand (διακόσιοι χίλιοι). Ancient Greeks also used sexagesimal systems, or base-60 system, by influence of Mesopotamian mathematics. For sexagesimal notations, I write 12°34′56″7‴8⁗ for degrees (360 degrees = 1 turn), 12p34′56″7‴8⁗ for segments (120 segments = 1 diameter; “p” stands for partes “parts”), and modern notation like 1,2;3,4 for general sexagesimal fractions. In modern sexagesimal notation, “,” is a sexagesimal separator and “;” is followed by a fraction part. Therefore \(\text{1,2;3,4} = 1 \times 60 + 2 + \frac{3}{60} + \frac{4}{60^2}\).

Throughout the document Greek texts lowercase and uppercase letters are distinguished (e.g., μ vs. Μ) for readability and to follow modern printing conventions. That distinction did not exist in Ancient Greek; minuscule script was invented in 9th century (Irigoin, 1996, p. 69).

Systems

Numerals

In every language numerals has existed before invention of writings, including alphabets and numbers. Therefore I firstly introduce numerals. For simplicity, I only refer Attic dialect, which was one of the major dialects of Ancient Greek and had been considered the norm of written language until Modern Greek took in place. Please see cited books if you are interested in other dialects. Therefore the geminated consonant “ττ” appears instead of “σσ” in Ionic dialect and Koiné Greek. E.g., τέτταρες instead of τέσσαρες.

The below Attic Greek numerals are based on a table listed in (Smyth, 1920, sec. 347). Cardinal numbers are one, two, three and so on; ordinal numbers are first, second, third and so on; and adverbial numbers are once, twice, thrice and so on. Since Greek has declension—an adjective changes their form depending on gender, number, and case—two or three forms in nominative case may be shown in each cardinal number or ordinal number field.

Number Cardinal Ordinal Adverbial
1 εἷς, μία, ἕν one πρῶτος, -η, -ον first ἅπαξ once
2 δύο two δεύτερος second δίς twice
3 τρεῖς, τρία three τρίτος third τρίς trice
4 τέτταρες, τέτταρα τέταρτος τετράκις
5 πέντε πέμπτος πεντάκις
6 ἕξ ἕκτος ἕξάκις
7 ἑπτά ἕβδομος ἑπτάκις
8 ὀκτώ ὄγδοος ὀκτάκις
9 ἐννέα ἔνατος ἐνάκις
10 δέκα δέκατος, -η, -ον δεκάκις
11 ἕνδεκα ἑνδέκατος ἑνδεκάκις
12 δώδεκα δωδέκατος δωδεκάκις
13 τρεῖς (τρία) καὶ δέκα (or τρεισκαίδεκα) τρίτος καὶ δέκατος τρεισκαιδεκάκις
14 τέτταρες (τέτταρα) καὶ δέκα τέταρτος καὶ δέκατος τετταρεσκαιδεκάκις
15 πεντεκαίδεκα πέμπτος καὶ δέκατος πεντεκαιδεκάκις
16 ἑκκαίδεκα ἕκτος καὶ δέκατος ἑκκαιδεκάκις
17 ἑπτακαίδεκα ἕβδομος καὶ δέκατος ἑπτακαιδεκάκις
18 ὀκτωκαίδεκα ὄγδοος καὶ δέκατος ὀκτωκαιδεκάκις
19 ἐννεακαίδεκα ἔνατος καὶ δέκατος ἐννεακαιδεκάκις
20 εἴκοσι(ν) εἰκοστός, -ή, -όν εἰκοσάκις
21 εἷς καὶ εἴκοσι(ν) or εἴκοσι (καὶ) εἷς πρῶτος καὶ εἰκοστός εἰκοσάκις ἅπαξ
30 τριᾱ́κοντα τριᾱκοστός τριᾱκοντάκις
40 τετταράκοντα τετταρακοστός τετταρακοστάκις
50 πεντήκοντα πεντηκοστός πεντηκοντάκις
60 ἑξήκοντα ἑξηκοστός ἑξηκοντάκις
70 ἑβδομήκοντα ἑβδομηκοστός ἑβδομηκοντάκις
80 ὀγδοήκοντα ὀγδοηκοστός ὀγδοηκοντάκις
90 ένενήκοντα ἐνενηκοστός ἐνενηκοντάκις
100 ἑκατόν ἑκατοστός, -ή, -όν ἑκατοντάκις
200 διᾱκόσιοι, -αι, -α διᾱκοσιοστός διᾱκοσιάκις
300 τριᾱκόσιοι τριᾱκοσιοστός τριᾱκοσιάκις
400 τετρακόσιοι τετρακοσιοστός τετρακοσιάκις
500 πεντακόσιοι πεντακοσιοστός πεντακοσιάκις
600 ἑξακόσιοι ἑξακοσιοστός ἑξακοσιάκις
700 ἑπτακόσιοι ἑπτακοσιοστός ἑπτακοσιάκις
800 ὀκτακόσιοι ὀκτακοσιοστός ὀκτακοσιάκις
900 ἐνακόσιοι ἐνακοσιοστός ἐνακοσιάκις
1000 χῑ́λιοι, -αι, -α χιλῑστός, -ή, -όν χῑλιάκις
2000 δισχῑ́λιοι δισχῑλιοστός δισχῑλιάκις
3000 τρισχῑ́λιοι τρισχῑλιοστός τρισχῑλιάκις
1,0000 μῡ́ριοι, -αι, -α μῡριοστός μῡράκις
2,0000 δισμῡ́ριοι δύο μυριάδες δισμῡριοστός δισμῡριάκις
10,0000 δεκακισμῡ́ριοι δεκακισμῡριοστός δεκακισμῡριάκις

Cardinal

This section is based on (Smyth, 1920, secs. 347, 349–350).

Only numerals 1, 2, 3, 4, and numerals ending with -κόσιοι, -χῑ́λιοι, and μῡ́ριοι, are declinable as a first–second declension adjective. In other words, single word numerals 5 to 199 are undeclinable (Smyth, 1920, sec. 350).

In Attic dialect, 13 and 14 are represented by compound numbers rather than compound words; thus τρεῖς καὶ δέκα “three and ten” and τέτταρες καὶ δέκα “four and ten” rather than τρεισκαίδεκα “three-and-ten” and τετταρεσκαίδεκα “four-and-ten”, respectively.

εἴκοσι(ν) 20 has a movable nu, which appears as εἴκοσι or εἴκοσιν.

Word order usually appears in one of the following three formats:

Common systems for numbers greater than 9999

In this section, all emphases and quoted translations to Greek texts are mine.

There are two kinds of numerals to represent numbers greater than 9999. Here I call them n-κισμύριοι “n-times-ten-thousand” system and n μυριάδες “n ten-thousands” system.

Both system were even used in the same sentence. For example, πεζῶν μὲν ἔχων εἰς ἐννέα μυριάδας (9,0000 acc.), ἱππεῖς δὲ περὶ μυρίους καὶ δισχιλίους (1,2000 acc.). Polyb.Hist.3.35.1

Generally speaking, n-κισμύριοι system is limited for smaller numbers namely \(n \le 7\). A notable exception is Polybius’s πεντηκοντακισμυρίους καὶ τετρακισμυρίους Polyb.Hist.21.43.19, representing 54,0000. On the other hand, n μυριάδες system can be used for bigger numbers. Especially, mathematical documents prefer n μυριάδες system over n-κισμύριοι system.

Ordinal

This section is based on (Smyth, 1920, sec. 347).

(Smyth, 1920, sec. 350b) writes

For 21st, 31st, etc., εἷς (for πρῶτος) καὶ εἰκοστός (τριᾱκοστός) is permissible, but otherwise the cardinal is rarely thus joined with the ordinal.

Unlike cardinal numbers, every ordinal number is delinable.

Adverbial

See (Smyth, 1920, sec. 347).

Decimal Systems before Ionian Systems

Linear B (TBU)

Attic

Attic number system is the oldest number system after Linear B numbers. It is a decimal system like Egyptian Hieroglyphic numerals. Similarly to Roman numerals, Attic numerals have symbols for 1 Ι, 5 Π, 10 Δ, 50 𐅄, 100 Η, 500 𐅅, 1000 Χ, 5000 𐅆, 1,0000 Μ, and 5,0000 𐅇—they are simply lined up, as 153 Η𐅄ΙΙΙ and 44 ΔΔΔΔΙΙΙΙ (Thomas, 1991, pp. 41–42).

Ionian Decimal Systems or Ordinary Alphabetic Numerals

Common Ionian

This section describes the common number system used since Classic period (5c. BCE) to modern age.

Ionian notation is decimal system where different letters are assigned for every digit. For example, 111 \((= 100 + 10 + 1)\) is expressed by ρια which consists of ρ denoting 100, ι 10, and α 1.

Here are symbols representing 1 to 9000, based on (Heath, 1931, p. 18).

Number Symbol Number Symbol Number Symbol Number Symbol
1 α 10 ι 100 ρ 1000 ͵α
2 β 20 κ 200 σ 2000 ͵β
3 γ 30 λ 300 τ 3000 ͵γ
4 δ 40 μ 400 υ 4000 ͵δ
5 ε 50 ν 500 φ 5000 ͵ε
6 ϛ 60 ξ 600 χ 6000 ͵ϛ
7 ζ 70 ο 700 ψ 7000 ͵ζ
8 η 80 π 800 ω 8000 ͵η
9 θ 90 ϟ 900 ϡ 9000 ͵θ

There were a few way to distinguish numbers from ordinal texts. Usual way used in manuscripts is drawing overline over a number (e.g., κε 25). In Modern Greek, symbol “ʹ” κεραία (U+0374 GREEK NUMERAL SIGN) is attached to the right top (e.g., κεʹ 25).

(Heath, 1931, pp. 17–18) explains:

To distinguish letters denoting numbers from the letters forming words in any passage various devices were used. The numeral might be put between dots, ⁝ or :, or space might be left on each side. In Imperial times it became usual to put a horizontal stroke over the numeral, e.g. ἡ βουλὺ τῶν Χ̄, variations being ⸱Χ⸱ and Χ̆ the like. In cursive writing the stroke over the letter became the orthodox mark for the numeral or the collection of numeral signs.

(Emde Boas et al., 2019, sec. 9.13) insists the symbol order is arbitrary:

Complex numbers are formed by combining the letter symbols. Only the rightmost letter (and the leftmost with numbers over 1000) have the stroke:

τιθʹ = 319 (any ordering was possible: τθιʹ, θτιʹ, etc.)

͵ατιθʹ = 1319

although I have never seen any ordering other than the descending order.

Greek started to use zero since Hellenistic times (Emde Boas et al., 2019, sec. 9.13). The symbol was registered in Unicode as U+1018A 𐆊. See (Mercier, 2004) for details.

For numbers 1,0000 and followings, Ancient Greeks stack number symbols on “Μ” stands for μύριοι “ten-thousand.” For example, Μ͵ζροε͵εωοε meaning 7175,5875.

Diophantus

For numbers 1,0000 and followings, Diophantus put a dot instead of using stacked number with “Μ”, as used in Arithmetica iv. 18 (Thomas, 1993, p. 550), where 26,2143 (κϛ.͵βρμγ) appears as a numerator (Note: contrary to modern mathematics notation, a numerator is located below a denominator).

Ἐπὶ τὰς ὑποστάσεις· ἔσται ὁ αος ἑνὸς ιϛον, ὁ δὲ βος ͵δϟϛκϛ. ͵βρμγ.

and (Heath, 1897, p. lxix)

Diophantus denoted myriads followed by thousands by the ordinary signs for numbers of units, only separating them by a dot from the thousands. Thus for 3,069,000 he writes τϛ.͵θ, and λγ.͵αψοϛ for 331,776.

This converter does not yet support ΜΥ prefix described in (Thomas, 1991, p. 44)

Another method is to use the sign Μ or ΜΥ for the myriad and to put the number of myriads after it, separated by a dot from the thousands.

Thus

ΜΥρδ.͵ηφοϛ (Diophantus vi. 22, ed. Tannery 446. 11).

This converter extends the system for numbers greater than 9999,9999, interpreting the system “putting a dot between every myriads.”

Heron

Some other writers including Heron used another system for myriads—they wrote two dots “¨” to multiply a number symbol by ten thousand. (Thomas, 1991, p. 44) says

In a third method the symbol M is not used, but the symbol representing the number of myriads has two dots placed over it.

Thus

α̈. ͵ηχϟϛ = 18596 (Heron, Geometrica xvii. 33, ed. Heiberg 348. 35).

Heron commenly wrote the word μυριάδες in full.

and (Heath, 1897, p. lxix) says

Sometimes myriads were represented by the ordinary letters with two dots above, as ρ̈ = 100 myriads (1,000,000), and myriads of myriads with two pairs of dots, as ϊ̈ for 10 myriad-myriads (1,000,000,000).

Aristarchus

Based on Greek number systems, which is apparently written by those who do not know Greek language, hence not reliable. I’m now finding more reliable sources.

This converter extends the system for numbers greater than 9999,9999, interpreting the system “putting Μ between every myriads.”

Apollonius

Apollonius invented his own way to denote bigger numbers based on myriad (Hultsch, 1876, pp. 2–29).

Optionally a number 1 to 9999 may be referred as a multiple of “μο” meaning μονάς “unit,” then a multiple of ten thousand (1,0000) is expressed as a multiple of “μα” meaning μυριάδες ἁπλαῖ “single myriads.” Similarly squared ten thousand (1,0000,0000) is represented by “μβ” meaning μυριάδες διπλαῖ “double myriads,” cubed ten thousand (1,0000,0000,0000) by “μγ” meaning μυριάδες τριπλαῖ “triple myriad,” and so on. For example, 12,0045,6789 would be written as μβ ιβ καὶ μαμε καὶ μο ͵ϛψπθ “12 double myriads and 45 single myriads and 6789 units.”

Symbol Word Number
μο μονάς \(10^0 = 1\)
μα μυριάδες ἁπλαῖ \(10^{1⨯4} = 1,0000\)
μβ μυριάδες διπλαῖ \(10^{2⨯4} = 1,0000,0000\)
μγ μυριάδες τριπλαῖ \(10^{3⨯4} = 1,0000,0000,0000\)
μ(n) μυριάδες n-πλαῖ \(10^{4n}\)
μβ ιβ δώδεκα μυριάδες τριπλαῖ \(12⨯10^{3⨯4} = 12,0000,0000,0000\)

His system is similar to 萬進法 “base-ten-thousand system” used in East Asia, comparing to Archimedes’s one similar to 萬萬進法 “base-hundred-million system.”

Due to limitation of printing technology, (Hultsch 1876) typeset an exponent as a superscript as μο, while two manuscripts, Vat. gr. 218 and Par. gr. 2440, wrote the exponent above μ. I use superscripts in the description texts and stacked numbers in the converter.

Modified Apollonius

In Apollonius notation, μο could represents both μονάδες “units” and μυριάδες ἑβδομηκονταπλαῖ “60-fold myriads.” To distinguish them I introduced case distinction—lowercase μ for μο “μονάδες” and uppercase Μ for Μα “μυριάδες ἁπλαῖ”, Μβ “μυριάδες διπλαῖ”, and so on.

Russell Cottrell’s Notation

Russell Cottrell’s Notation explained in this section was not used by Ancient Greeks. As of now, there is no method to spell out numbers written in this notation.

This is based on a idea proposed by Russell Cottrell. Although his description is contradicting to his converter’s outputs, he gave some examples in his Greek Number Converter Greek Number Converter:

Partly because of limitations imposed by web page forms, I have modernized the rendering slightly by placing the power of the myriad beside, rather than above, the M; separating the groups by commas; and using the later convention of accent-like upper and lower numeral signs instead of an iota superscript.

For example: 2,056,839,184 becomes βΜκʹ, αΜ͵εχπγ, ͵θρπδ. ͵θρπδ represents the final 9184, ͵εχπγ the 5683, with αΜ indicating that the latter is multiplied by the first power of M (10,000). βΜκʹ represents 20 multiplied by the second power of M (100,000,000).

Ignoring unclear usage of “ʹ” his idea can be summarized as follows.

<number>        ::= { <group> "," } <group>
<group>         ::= <exponent> "Μ" <significand> [ <number-mark> ]
                  | <significand> ; where exponent is 1
<number-mark>   ::= "ʹ"
<exponent>      ::= <simple-number>
<significand>   ::= <simple-number>
<simple-number> ::= Ionic number 1 to 9999

With slight modification, we can unambiguously represent any natural numbers.

<number>        ::= <group(0)> <number-mark>
                  | <groups(0)> <number-mark>
<groups(n)>     ::= <group(n)> <number-mark>*n ( "," <group(n)>  <number-mark>*n )+
                  ; n is a natural number.
                  ; <number-mark> is repeated n times.
<group(n)>      ::= <exponent(n)> "Μ" <significand>
                  | <significand> ; where exponent is 1
<number-mark>   ::= "ʹ"
<exponent(n)>   ::= <group(n)>
                  | <groups(n+1)>
<significand>   ::= <simple-number>
<simple-number> ::= Ionic number 1 to 9999

Examples:

Archimedes

Archimedes invented myriad-myriad based numerals in The Sand Reckoner (Heath, 1897, pp. 227–229). He introduced a numeral αἱ l-στᾶς περιόδου m-στῶν ἀριθμῶν n, meaning “number n of the m-th order of the l-th period,” expressing \(n × d^{(l − 1)d + m − 1}\), where \(d = 1,0000,0000\). In his system, the biggest number is αἱ μυριακισμυριοστᾶς περιόδου μυριακισμυριοστῶν ἀριθμῶν μυρίαι μυριάδες a myriad-myriad units of the myriad-myriad-th order of the myriad-myriad-th period, which is \(10^{8 × 10^{16}}\).

Fractions

Words representing fractions

There are several ways to express fractions.

Mixed fractions are simply represented by juxtaposing an integer and a fraction.

also ἀνὰ δύο ἥμισυ ζῳδίων amounting to 2\(\frac{1}{2}\) signs, Autol.1.10 (Liddell et al., 1940, “ἀνά” C.III.)

Notations for fractions

(Heath, 1931, pp. 20–22) explains several fraction notations.

Unit fractions can be expressed with “ʹ” instead of a overbar (e.g., γʹ \(\frac{1}{3}\)), aside from special symbols for \(\frac{1}{2}\) 𐅵 and \(\frac{2}{3}\) 𐅷.

We find in Archimedes ʹ δʹ = \(\frac{1}{2} \frac{1}{4}\) for \(\frac{3}{4}\), and in Heron κθ 𐅷ʹ ιγʹ λθʹ = \(29\frac{2}{3} \frac{1}{13} \frac{1}{39}\) for \(29 \frac{10}{13}\), and so on. (Heath, 1931, p. 20)

Instead of single “ʹ”, double “″” can be used.

A less orthodox method (found in later manuscripts) was to affix two accents, e.g., ζ″ = \(\frac{1}{7}\). Diophantus uses, instead of the accent, a sign which Tannery printed as , e.g., γ = \(\frac{1}{3}\).

Hence the numerator could be represented by the ordinary numeral, and the denominator by the accented numeral meaning the aliquot part. (Heath, 1931, p. 20)

Sexagesimal Systems

Sexagesimal

Ancient Greeks inherited sexagesimal (base-60) system invented in Mesopotamian mathematics. In Ancient Greek ordinal number ἑξηκοστός “sixtieth” means fraction 1/60 as well as English, as I explained in the previous section. Minutes is called πρῶτα ἑξηκοστά “first sixtieth,” second is called δεύτερα ἑξηκοστά “second sixtieth,” and so on (Thomas, 1991, pp. 48–61).

Sexagesimal Ptolemy

Ancient Greeks, especially Ptolemy, used zero in sexagesimal fractions. (Thomas, 1991, p. 47) says

In his sexagesimal notation, Ptolemy used the symbol O to stand for οὐδεμία μοῖρα or οὐδὲν ἑξηκοστόν. The diverse views which have been held on this symbol from the time of Delambre are summed up by Loria (Le scienze esatte nell’ antica Grecia, p.761) in the words: “In base ai documenti scoperti e decifrati sino ad oggi, siamo autorizzati a negare che i Greci usasserolo zero nel senso e nel modo in cui lo adoperiamo noi.

and

Unicode proposal L2/04-054 (Mercier, 2004) has detailed description about zero.

Revisions

All the revisions of this page can be retrieved from GitHub na4zagin3/na4zagin3.github.io.

Abbreviations

General

acc.
accusative
dat.
dative
gen.
genitive
nom.
nominative

Texts

Polyb.Hist.
Polybius, Histories

Papyri

bgu.3.988
http://papyri.info/ddbdp/bgu;3;988

References

Bergk, T. (Ed.). (1882). Poetae Lyrici Graeci (Vol. 2). Aedigus B.G. Teubneri. https://archive.org/details/poetaelyricigrae02berguoft

Bernardakis, G. N. (Ed.). (1895). Plutarchi Chaeronensis Moralia (Vol. 4). Aedibus B.G. Teubneri. https://archive.org/details/plutarchichaero12berngoog

Emde Boas, E. van, Rijksbaron, H., Albert, & Bakker, M. de. (2019). Cambridge grammar of classical Greek. Cambridge University Press.

Heath, S., Thomas Little (Ed.). (1897). The works of Archimedes. Cambridge University Press.

Heath, S., Thomas Little (Ed.). (1931). A manual of Greek mathematics. Clarendon Press.

Hultsch, F. (Ed.). (1876). Pappi Alexandrini collectionis quae supersunt (Vol. 1). Apud Weidmannos.

Irigoin, J. (1996). Les origines de la capitale typographique grecque 1476–1550. In M. S. Macrakis (Ed.), Greek Letters: From Tablets to Pixels (pp. 69–81). Ork Knoll Press.

Keil, H. (1860). Questiones grammaticae. Typis B.G. Teubneri. https://archive.org/details/quaestionesgram00keilgoog

Liddell, H. G., Scott, R., & Jones, S., Henry Stuart (Eds.). (1940). A Greek-English lexicon (9th ed., Vols. 1–2). Clarendon Press.

Mercier, R. (2004). Proposal to encode Greek zero in the UCS (L2/04-054). Unicode. https://www.unicode.org/L2/L2004/04054r-greek-zero.pdf

Montanari, F. (Ed.). (2015). Ἡμισύτριτον. https://dictionaries.brillonline.com/search#dictionary=montanari&id=52017

Passow, F. (1847). Handwörterbuch der griechischen Sprache (5th ed., Vol. 1.2). Friedrich Christian Wilhelm Vogel.

Smyth, H. W. (1920). Greek grammar for colleges. American Book Company.

Thomas, I. (Ed.). (1991). Greek methematical works: Thales to Euclid (Vol. 1). Harvard University Press.

Thomas, I. (Ed.). (1993). Greek methematical works: Aristarchus to Pappus (Vol. 2). Harvard University Press.


  1. Citation requred.

  2. Compound numeral ἥμισυ τρίτον usually represents unit fraction series \(\frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{3}\).

    Passow’s dictionary (Passow, 1847), which LSJ based on, regarded this ἥμισυ τρίτον as a single word meaning \(2\frac{1}{2}\) rather

    ἡμισύτρῐτον, τό, Hesych., richtiger ἥμισυ τρίτον, drittenhalb, wofür Spätere δύο ἥμισυ sagten; vgl. Didym. b. Prisc. t. 2. p. 395 Krehl.

    while (Liddell et al., 1940)

    ἡμῐσύ-τρῐτον, τό, a third half, i.e. one [sic] and a half, Archil.167.

    and (Montanari, 2015, “ἡμισύτριτον” accessed on 2020-09-05)

    ἡμισύτριτον -ου, τό

    [ἥμισυς, τρίτος]

    half of three, i.e.
    Archil. 243

    written for ἥμισυ τρίτον.

    gave sense \(1\frac{1}{2}\), referencing the following fragment (Bergk, 1882, p. 431).

    167. [147.]

    Hesych.: ἥμισυ τρίτον· δύο ἥμισυ· Ἀρχίλοχος H. Keil (Quaest. Gramm. p. 12) putat Archilochi nomen ex errore ortum: Hesychium usum grammatico, qui τρίτον ἥμισυ et τρίτον ἡμιπόδιον explicaverit, adhibito Archilochi versu: ἐν δὲ Βατουσιάδης, male Archilochi testimonoum retulisse ad ἥμισυ τρίτον. Quae non recte disputata esse docui Philol. XVI 587 seq.

    Regardless of which ἥμισυ τρίτον was an error, it clearly means δύο ἥμισυ \(2\frac{1}{2}\) in this context rather than \(1\frac{1}{2}\) given in LSJ.

  3. 1 σπιθαμαί span = 1 ἡμίπηχυς half-qubit = ½ πήχυς qubits

  4. Citation required.